----------------------

Too Busy to Be Productive

In Trends on November 15, 2010 at 8:12 pm
For me, the holidays are a time for slowing down, refection, evaluation and planning for the new year. If that’s true for you, consider the question I’m mulling in my evaluation of 2010 and plans for 2011:


Are you too busy to be productive?

I am. I work late hours, skip meals, rush and race all in the name of getting more done. But the irony is that my quest to cram more in is the very thing that keeps me from actually producing what I set out to produce – the best quality work I can deliver.


I’m not alone. How many times this week has someone told you they’re busy? We’re all busy. Even when the economy is slow and orders are sparse, we find ways to make ourselves busy – to fill our schedules with busy work.


We Americans wear our busyness like a badge. After all, if someone is busy, they must be important, right? If they have a lot of people wanting to get on their schedule, they must have something to offer those people. Our entire culture has bought into this idea. It’s a social axiom that no one dares deny – the busier you are, the more important you are. Who is the busiest person in America? The president, of course.


This week, Newsweek released a story about just how busy the president is. How much does the president have on his plate? So much that he needs 469 employees to help him.


What’s more, busyness spirals. The more important a person gets (translation: “higher ranking” – we also confuse rank with importance, but that’s another blog entry), the more that person is expected to weigh in on various matters. And the more matters he’s expected to address, the more busy he gets.


Busyness is an epidemic. And while we all acknowledge that we’re too busy and should probably slow down, none of us seems to be very serious about actually doing it.


It has not always been so. In 1936, President Franklin Roosevelt started forming the first presidential cabinet – six aides to help him handle the workload imposed by the New Deal. Before 1936, President of the United States was a one-man job! What has changed? Is the growth in White House busyness from six to 469 staff simply a function of population growth? Of faster and better communications? Of trickier political and policy challenges? I don’t think so. I think White House busyness is spiraling out of control for the same reasons our personal busyness has spiraled. We don’t recognize it for the threat it is. And we don’t have a model for slowing down.
Advertisements
  1. […] 19, 2010 at 9:25 pm For Part One of this three-part series of entries on Busyness Syndrome, click here. For Part Two, click […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: